Total
2130 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-22802 | 1 Schneider-electric | 1 Interactive Graphical Scada System Data Collector | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerability exists that could result in remote code execution due to missing length check on user supplied data, when a constructed message is received on the network. Affected Product: Interactive Graphical SCADA System Data Collector (dc.exe) (V15.0.0.21243 and prior) | |||||
| CVE-2022-26335 | 1 Siemens | 48 Scalance X302-7eec, Scalance X302-7eec Firmware, Scalance X304-2fe and 45 more | 2023-12-10 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X304-2FE, SCALANCE X306-1LD FE, SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X320-1 FE, SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FE, SCALANCE X408-2, SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front), SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2. Affected devices do not properly validate the URI of incoming HTTP GET requests. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash affected devices. | |||||
| CVE-2021-46122 | 1 Tp-link | 2 Tl-wr840n, Tl-wr840n Firmware | 2023-12-10 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| Tp-Link TL-WR840N (EU) v6.20 Firmware (0.9.1 4.17 v0001.0 Build 201124 Rel.64328n) is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow via the Password reset feature. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43303 | 2 Debian, Teluu | 2 Debian Linux, Pjsip | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Buffer overflow in PJSUA API when calling pjsua_call_dump. An attacker-controlled 'buffer' argument may cause a buffer overflow, since supplying an output buffer smaller than 128 characters may overflow the output buffer, regardless of the 'maxlen' argument supplied | |||||
| CVE-2021-41413 | 1 Ok-file-formats Project | 1 Ok-file-formats | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| ok-file-formats master 2021-9-12 is affected by a buffer overflow in ok_jpg_convert_data_unit_grayscale and ok_jpg_convert_YCbCr_to_RGB. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22087 | 1 Qualcomm | 309 Apq8009, Apq8009 Firmware, Apq8009w and 306 more | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| memory corruption in video due to buffer overflow while parsing mkv clip with no codechecker in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables | |||||
| CVE-2022-21742 | 1 Realtek | 14 Rtl8152b, Rtl8152b Firmware, Rtl8153 and 11 more | 2023-12-10 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Realtek USB driver has a buffer overflow vulnerability due to insufficient parameter length verification in the API function. An unauthenticated LAN attacker can exploit this vulnerability to disrupt services. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26741 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2023-12-10 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.4. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0636 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Thin Installer | 2023-12-10 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A denial of service vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Thin Installer prior to version 1.3.0039 that could trigger a system crash. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44625 | 1 Tp-link | 2 Tl-wr886n, Tl-wr886n Firmware | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Buffer Overflow vulnerability exists in TP-LINK WR-886N 20190826 2.3.8 in /cloud_config/cloud_device/info interface, which allows a malicious user to executee arbitrary code on the system via a crafted post request. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24704 | 1 Accel-ppp | 1 Accel-ppp | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The rad_packet_recv function in opt/src/accel-pppd/radius/packet.c suffers from a buffer overflow vulnerability, whereby user input len is copied into a fixed buffer &attr->val.integer without any bound checks. If the client connects to the server and sends a large radius packet, a buffer overflow vulnerability will be triggered. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1735 | 2 Apple, Vim | 2 Macos, Vim | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Classic Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4969. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23851 | 1 Bosch | 136 Autodome 7000, Autodome 7000 Firmware, Autodome Ip 4000 Hd and 133 more | 2023-12-10 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A specially crafted TCP/IP packet may cause the camera recovery image web interface to crash. It may also cause a buffer overflow which could enable remote code execution. The recovery image can only be booted with administrative rights or with physical access to the camera and allows the upload of a new firmware in case of a damaged firmware. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22819 | 1 Nxp | 12 Lpc55s66jbd100, Lpc55s66jbd100 Firmware, Lpc55s66jbd64 and 9 more | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| NXP LPC55S66JBD64, LPC55S66JBD100, LPC55S66JEV98, LPC55S69JBD64, LPC55S69JBD100, and LPC55S69JEV98 microcontrollers (ROM version 1B) have a buffer overflow in parsing SB2 updates before the signature is verified. This can allow an attacker to achieve non-persistent code execution via a crafted unsigned update. | |||||
| CVE-2021-30324 | 1 Qualcomm | 302 Apq8096au, Apq8096au Firmware, Ar8031 and 299 more | 2023-12-10 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Possible out of bound write due to lack of boundary check for the maximum size of buffer when sending a DCI packet to remote process in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking | |||||
| CVE-2021-41751 | 1 Jerryscript | 1 Jerryscript | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Buffer overflow vulnerability in file ecma-builtin-array-prototype.c:909 in function ecma_builtin_array_prototype_object_slice in Jerryscript before commit e1ce7dd7271288be8c0c8136eea9107df73a8ce2 on Oct 20, 2021. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26749 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2023-12-10 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.4. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29246 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Rtos Usbx | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Azure RTOS USBX is a USB host, device, and on-the-go (OTG) embedded stack. Prior to version 6.1.11, he USBX DFU UPLOAD functionality may be utilized to introduce a buffer overflow resulting in overwrite of memory contents. In particular cases this may allow an attacker to bypass security features or execute arbitrary code. The implementation of `ux_device_class_dfu_control_request` function does not assure that a buffer overflow will not occur during handling of the DFU UPLOAD command. When an attacker issues the `UX_SLAVE_CLASS_DFU_COMMAND_UPLOAD` control transfer request with `wLenght` larger than the buffer size (`UX_SLAVE_REQUEST_CONTROL_MAX_LENGTH`, 256 bytes), depending on the actual implementation of `dfu -> ux_slave_class_dfu_read`, a buffer overflow may occur. In example `ux_slave_class_dfu_read` may read 4096 bytes (or more up to 65k) to a 256 byte buffer ultimately resulting in an overflow. Furthermore in case an attacker has some control over the read flash memory, this may result in execution of arbitrary code and platform compromise. A fix for this issue has been included in USBX release 6.1.11. As a workaround, align request and buffer size to assure that buffer boundaries are respected. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26750 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2023-12-10 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.4. An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2021-4206 | 3 Debian, Qemu, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Qemu, Enterprise Linux | 2023-12-10 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 8.2 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in the QXL display device emulation in QEMU. An integer overflow in the cursor_alloc() function can lead to the allocation of a small cursor object followed by a subsequent heap-based buffer overflow. This flaw allows a malicious privileged guest user to crash the QEMU process on the host or potentially execute arbitrary code within the context of the QEMU process. | |||||