Total
14 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-34538 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Apache Hive before 3.1.3 "CREATE" and "DROP" function operations does not check for necessary authorization of involved entities in the query. It was found that an unauthorized user can manipulate an existing UDF without having the privileges to do so. This allowed unauthorized or underprivileged users to drop and recreate UDFs pointing them to new jars that could be potentially malicious. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13949 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 4 Hive, Thrift, Communications Cloud Native Core Network Slice Selection Function and 1 more | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Apache Thrift 0.9.3 to 0.13.0, malicious RPC clients could send short messages which would result in a large memory allocation, potentially leading to denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1926 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Apache Hive cookie signature verification used a non constant time comparison which is known to be vulnerable to timing attacks. This could allow recovery of another users cookie signature. The issue was addressed in Apache Hive 2.3.8 | |||||
| CVE-2018-21234 | 2 Apache, Jodd | 2 Hive, Jodd | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Jodd before 5.0.4 performs Deserialization of Untrusted JSON Data when setClassMetadataName is set. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11777 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Apache Hive 2.3.3, 3.1.0 and earlier, local resources on HiveServer2 machines are not properly protected against malicious user if ranger, sentry or sql standard authorizer is not in use. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1314 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In Apache Hive 2.3.3, 3.1.0 and earlier, Hive "EXPLAIN" operation does not check for necessary authorization of involved entities in a query. An unauthorized user can do "EXPLAIN" on arbitrary table or view and expose table metadata and statistics. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1284 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| In Apache Hive 0.6.0 to 2.3.2, malicious user might use any xpath UDFs (xpath/xpath_string/xpath_boolean/xpath_number/xpath_double/xpath_float/xpath_long/xpath_int/xpath_short) to expose the content of a file on the machine running HiveServer2 owned by HiveServer2 user (usually hive) if hive.server2.enable.doAs=false. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1282 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| This vulnerability in Apache Hive JDBC driver 0.7.1 to 2.3.2 allows carefully crafted arguments to be used to bypass the argument escaping/cleanup that JDBC driver does in PreparedStatement implementation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1315 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| In Apache Hive 2.1.0 to 2.3.2, when 'COPY FROM FTP' statement is run using HPL/SQL extension to Hive, a compromised/malicious FTP server can cause the file to be written to an arbitrary location on the cluster where the command is run from. This is because FTP client code in HPL/SQL does not verify the destination location of the downloaded file. This does not affect hive cli user and hiveserver2 user as hplsql is a separate command line script and needs to be invoked differently. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12625 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Apache Hive 2.1.x before 2.1.2, 2.2.x before 2.2.1, and 2.3.x before 2.3.1 expose an interface through which masking policies can be defined on tables or views, e.g., using Apache Ranger. When a view is created over a given table, the policy enforcement does not happen correctly on the table for masked columns. | |||||
| CVE-2016-3083 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). While validating the server's certificate during the connection setup, the client in Apache Hive before 1.2.2 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 doesn't seem to be verifying the common name attribute of the certificate. In this way, if a JDBC client sends an SSL request to server abc.com, and the server responds with a valid certificate (certified by CA) but issued to xyz.com, the client will accept that as a valid certificate and the SSL handshake will go through. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1772 | 2 Apache, Ibm | 2 Hive, Infosphere Biginsights | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.3 HIGH |
| The LDAP implementation in HiveServer2 in Apache Hive before 1.0.1 and 1.1.x before 1.1.1, as used in IBM InfoSphere BigInsights 3.0, 3.0.0.1, and 3.0.0.2 and other products, mishandles simple unauthenticated and anonymous bind configurations, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted LDAP request. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7521 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.3 HIGH |
| The authorization framework in Apache Hive 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0, 1.1.1, 1.2.0 and 1.2.1, on clusters protected by Ranger and SqlStdHiveAuthorization, allows attackers to bypass intended parent table access restrictions via unspecified partition-level operations. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0228 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Apache Hive before 0.13.1, when in SQL standards based authorization mode, does not properly check the file permissions for (1) import and (2) export statements, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via a crafted URI. | |||||