Total
170 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-7501 | 1 Redhat | 15 Data Grid, Jboss A-mq, Jboss Bpm Suite and 12 more | 2024-02-16 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. | |||||
| CVE-2023-44487 | 32 Akka, Amazon, Apache and 29 more | 310 Http Server, Opensearch Data Prepper, Apisix and 307 more | 2024-02-02 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5736 | 13 Apache, Canonical, D2iq and 10 more | 19 Mesos, Ubuntu Linux, Dc\/os and 16 more | 2024-02-02 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.6 HIGH |
| runc through 1.0-rc6, as used in Docker before 18.09.2 and other products, allows attackers to overwrite the host runc binary (and consequently obtain host root access) by leveraging the ability to execute a command as root within one of these types of containers: (1) a new container with an attacker-controlled image, or (2) an existing container, to which the attacker previously had write access, that can be attached with docker exec. This occurs because of file-descriptor mishandling, related to /proc/self/exe. | |||||
| CVE-2023-35900 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.4 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.5 is vulnerable to disclosing server version information which may be used to determine software vulnerabilities at the operating system level. IBM X-Force ID: 259368. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38734 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Robotic Process Automation, Windows, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.1 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.1 is vulnerable to incorrect privilege assignment when importing users from an LDAP directory. IBM X-Force ID: 262481. | |||||
| CVE-2023-43058 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 23.0.9 is vulnerable to privilege escalation that affects ownership of projects. IBM X-Force ID: 247527. | |||||
| CVE-2023-35901 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.6 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.6 is vulnerable to client side validation bypass which could allow invalid changes or values in some fields. IBM X-Force ID: 259380. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38732 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows and 1 more | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7 server could allow an authenticated user to view sensitive information from application logs. IBM X-Force ID: 262289. | |||||
| CVE-2023-40370 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows and 1 more | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.1 runtime is vulnerable to information disclosure of script content if the remote REST request computer policy is enabled. IBM X-Force ID: 263470. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38733 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Robotic Process Automation, Windows, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.1 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.1 server could allow an authenticated user to view sensitive information from installation logs. IBM X-Force Id: 262293. | |||||
| CVE-2023-22593 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Robotic Process Automation, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.1 through 21.0.7.3 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.3 is vulnerable to security misconfiguration of the Redis container which may provide elevated privileges. IBM X-Force ID: 244074. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27540 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Cloud Pak For Data, Watson Cp4d Data Stores, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Watson CP4D Data Stores 4.6.0 does not properly allocate resources without limits or throttling which could allow a remote attacker with information specific to the system to cause a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 248924. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36769 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Cloud Pak For Data, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Data 4.5 and 4.6 could allow a privileged user to upload malicious files of dangerous types that can be automatically processed within the product's environment. IBM X-Force ID: 232034. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23468 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Robotic Process Automation, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.1 through 21.0.7.3 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.3 is vulnerable to insufficient security configuration which may allow creation of namespaces within a cluster. IBM X-Force ID: 244500. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43573 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 is vulnerable to exposure of the name and email for the creator/modifier of platform level objects. IBM X-Force ID: 238678. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3259 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| Openshift 4.9 does not use HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) which may allow man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2023-22592 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.1 through 21.0.4 could allow a local user to perform unauthorized actions due to insufficient permission settings. IBM X-Force ID: 244073. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0229 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in github.com/openshift/apiserver-library-go, used in OpenShift 4.12 and 4.11, that contains an issue that can allow low-privileged users to set the seccomp profile for pods they control to "unconfined." By default, the seccomp profile used in the restricted-v2 Security Context Constraint (SCC) is "runtime/default," allowing users to disable seccomp for pods they can create and modify. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0296 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw (CVE-2016-2183) was reported for the health checks port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy, hence this port might be considered as still vulnerable to the same type of vulnerability. The health checks on etcd grpc-proxy do not contain sensitive data (only metrics data), therefore the potential impact related to this vulnerability is minimal. The CVE-2023-0296 has been assigned to this issue to track the permanent fix in the etcd component. | |||||
| CVE-2023-22863 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12.0 through 21.0.2 defaults to HTTP in some RPA commands when the prefix is not explicitly specified in the URL. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 244109. | |||||