Total
209 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-3560 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Samba | 2023-12-10 | 7.9 HIGH | N/A |
| NetBIOS name services daemon (nmbd) in Samba 4.0.x before 4.0.21 and 4.1.x before 4.1.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that modify heap memory, involving a sizeof operation on an incorrect variable in the unstrcpy macro in string_wrappers.h. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0244 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 3.3 LOW | N/A |
| The sys_recvfrom function in nmbd in Samba 3.6.x before 3.6.24, 4.0.x before 4.0.19, and 4.1.x before 4.1.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a malformed UDP packet. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0239 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The internal DNS server in Samba 4.x before 4.0.18 does not check the QR field in the header section of an incoming DNS message before sending a response, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and bandwidth consumption) via a forged response packet that triggers a communication loop, a related issue to CVE-1999-0103. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0240 | 4 Canonical, Novell, Redhat and 1 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop, Suse Linux Enterprise Server and 3 more | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The Netlogon server implementation in smbd in Samba 3.5.x and 3.6.x before 3.6.25, 4.0.x before 4.0.25, 4.1.x before 4.1.17, and 4.2.x before 4.2.0rc5 performs a free operation on an uninitialized stack pointer, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted Netlogon packets that use the ServerPasswordSet RPC API, as demonstrated by packets reaching the _netr_ServerPasswordSet function in rpc_server/netlogon/srv_netlog_nt.c. | |||||
| CVE-2013-6442 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The owner_set function in smbcacls.c in smbcacls in Samba 4.0.x before 4.0.16 and 4.1.x before 4.1.6 removes an ACL during use of a --chown or --chgrp option, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by leveraging an unintended administrative change. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0178 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Samba 3.6.6 through 3.6.23, 4.0.x before 4.0.18, and 4.1.x before 4.1.8, when a certain vfs shadow copy configuration is enabled, does not properly initialize the SRV_SNAPSHOT_ARRAY response field, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a (1) FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA or (2) FSCTL_SRV_ENUMERATE_SNAPSHOTS request. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4496 | 2 Canonical, Samba | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Samba | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Samba 3.x before 3.6.23, 4.0.x before 4.0.16, and 4.1.x before 4.1.6 does not enforce the password-guessing protection mechanism for all interfaces, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via brute-force ChangePasswordUser2 (1) SAMR or (2) RAP attempts. | |||||
| CVE-2014-8143 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 8.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Samba 4.0.x before 4.0.24, 4.1.x before 4.1.16, and 4.2.x before 4.2rc4, when an Active Directory Domain Controller (AD DC) is configured, allows remote authenticated users to set the LDB userAccountControl UF_SERVER_TRUST_ACCOUNT bit, and consequently gain privileges, by leveraging delegation of authority for user-account or computer-account creation. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0214 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 5.1 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.21, 3.6.x before 3.6.12, and 4.x before 4.0.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users by leveraging knowledge of a password and composing requests that perform SWAT actions. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0213 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 5.1 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.21, 3.6.x before 3.6.12, and 4.x before 4.0.2 allows remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a (1) FRAME or (2) IFRAME element. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4476 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 1.2 LOW | N/A |
| Samba 4.0.x before 4.0.11 and 4.1.x before 4.1.1, when LDAP or HTTP is provided over SSL, uses world-readable permissions for a private key, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the key file, as demonstrated by access to the local filesystem on an AD domain controller. | |||||
| CVE-2012-1182 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The RPC code generator in Samba 3.x before 3.4.16, 3.5.x before 3.5.14, and 3.6.x before 3.6.4 does not implement validation of an array length in a manner consistent with validation of array memory allocation, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted RPC call. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0172 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Samba 4.0.x before 4.0.1, in certain Active Directory domain-controller configurations, does not properly interpret Access Control Entries that are based on an objectClass, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended restrictions on modifying LDAP directory objects by leveraging (1) objectClass access by a user, (2) objectClass access by a group, or (3) write access to an attribute. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2111 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 6.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The (1) CreateAccount, (2) OpenAccount, (3) AddAccountRights, and (4) RemoveAccountRights LSA RPC procedures in smbd in Samba 3.4.x before 3.4.17, 3.5.x before 3.5.15, and 3.6.x before 3.6.5 do not properly restrict modifications to the privileges database, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain the "take ownership" privilege via an LSA connection. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4124 | 5 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Opensuse and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Opensuse and 2 more | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the read_nttrans_ea_list function in nttrans.c in smbd in Samba 3.x before 3.5.22, 3.6.x before 3.6.17, and 4.x before 4.0.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a malformed packet. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4408 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 8.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the dcerpc_read_ncacn_packet_done function in librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c in winbindd in Samba 3.x before 3.6.22, 4.0.x before 4.0.13, and 4.1.x before 4.1.3 allows remote AD domain controllers to execute arbitrary code via an invalid fragment length in a DCE-RPC packet. | |||||
| CVE-2013-1863 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2023-12-10 | 6.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Samba 4.x before 4.0.4, when configured as an Active Directory domain controller, uses world-writable permissions on non-default CIFS shares, which allows remote authenticated users to read, modify, create, or delete arbitrary files via standard filesystem operations. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4475 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Samba | 2023-12-10 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Samba 3.2.x through 3.6.x before 3.6.20, 4.0.x before 4.0.11, and 4.1.x before 4.1.1, when vfs_streams_depot or vfs_streams_xattr is enabled, allows remote attackers to bypass intended file restrictions by leveraging ACL differences between a file and an associated alternate data stream (ADS). | |||||
| CVE-2012-6150 | 2 Canonical, Samba | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Samba | 2023-12-10 | 3.6 LOW | N/A |
| The winbind_name_list_to_sid_string_list function in nsswitch/pam_winbind.c in Samba through 4.1.2 handles invalid require_membership_of group names by accepting authentication by any user, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by leveraging an administrator's pam_winbind configuration-file mistake. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0454 | 3 Canonical, Ibm, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Storwize, Samba | 2023-12-10 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The SMB2 implementation in Samba 3.6.x before 3.6.6, as used on the IBM Storwize V7000 Unified 1.3 before 1.3.2.3 and 1.4 before 1.4.0.1 and possibly other products, does not properly enforce CIFS share attributes, which allows remote authenticated users to (1) write to a read-only share; (2) trigger data-integrity problems related to the oplock, locking, coherency, or leases attribute; or (3) have an unspecified impact by leveraging incorrect handling of the browseable or "hide unreadable" parameter. | |||||