Filtered by vendor Apache
Subscribe
Total
681 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-7430 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2023-12-10 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 8.4 HIGH |
| The Hadoop connector 1.1.1, 2.4, 2.5, and 2.7.0-0 before 2.7.0-3 for IBM Spectrum Scale and General Parallel File System (GPFS) allows local users to read or write to arbitrary GPFS data via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4978 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Activemq Artemis, Enterprise Linux Server, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2023-12-10 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| The getObject method of the javax.jms.ObjectMessage class in the (1) JMS Core client, (2) Artemis broker, and (3) Artemis REST component in Apache ActiveMQ Artemis before 1.4.0 might allow remote authenticated users with permission to send messages to the Artemis broker to deserialize arbitrary objects and execute arbitrary code by leveraging gadget classes being present on the Artemis classpath. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7611 | 1 Apache | 1 James Server | 2023-12-10 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| Apache James Server 2.3.2, when configured with file-based user repositories, allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4979 | 1 Apache | 1 Http Server | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Apache HTTP Server 2.4.18 through 2.4.20, when mod_http2 and mod_ssl are enabled, does not properly recognize the "SSLVerifyClient require" directive for HTTP/2 request authorization, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the ability to send multiple requests over a single connection and aborting a renegotiation. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5349 | 1 Apache | 2 Directory Studio, Ldap Studio | 2023-12-10 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| The CSV export in Apache LDAP Studio and Apache Directory Studio before 2.0.0-M10 does not properly escape field values, which might allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands by leveraging a crafted LDAP entry that is interpreted as a formula when imported into a spreadsheet. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0714 | 3 Apache, Canonical, Debian | 3 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux | 2023-12-10 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The session-persistence implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.45, 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 mishandles session attributes, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager restrictions and execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via a web application that places a crafted object in a session. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1772 | 2 Apache, Ibm | 2 Hive, Infosphere Biginsights | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.3 HIGH |
| The LDAP implementation in HiveServer2 in Apache Hive before 1.0.1 and 1.1.x before 1.1.1, as used in IBM InfoSphere BigInsights 3.0, 3.0.0.1, and 3.0.0.2 and other products, mishandles simple unauthenticated and anonymous bind configurations, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted LDAP request. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0760 | 1 Apache | 1 Sentry | 2023-12-10 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple incomplete blacklist vulnerabilities in Apache Sentry before 1.7.0 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via the (1) reflect, (2) reflect2, or (3) java_method Hive builtin functions. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0709 | 1 Apache | 1 Jetspeed | 2023-12-10 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the Import/Export function in the Portal Site Manager in Apache Jetspeed before 2.3.1 allows remote authenticated administrators to write to arbitrary files, and consequently execute arbitrary code, via a .. (dot dot) in a ZIP archive entry, as demonstrated by "../../webapps/x.jsp." | |||||
| CVE-2016-4469 | 1 Apache | 1 Archiva | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Apache Archiva 1.3.9 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add new repository proxy connectors via the token parameter to admin/addProxyConnector_commit.action, (2) new repositories via the token parameter to admin/addRepository_commit.action, (3) edit existing repositories via the token parameter to admin/editRepository_commit.action, (4) add legacy artifact paths via the token parameter to admin/addLegacyArtifactPath_commit.action, (5) change the organizational appearance via the token parameter to admin/saveAppearance.action, or (6) upload new artifacts via the token parameter to upload_submit.action. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2164 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The (1) FileService.importFileByInternalUserId and (2) FileService.importFile SOAP API methods in Apache OpenMeetings before 3.1.1 improperly use the Java URL class without checking the specified protocol handler, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files by attempting to upload a file. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7521 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.3 HIGH |
| The authorization framework in Apache Hive 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0, 1.1.1, 1.2.0 and 1.2.1, on clusters protected by Ranger and SqlStdHiveAuthorization, allows attackers to bypass intended parent table access restrictions via unspecified partition-level operations. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4430 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Apache Struts 2 2.3.20 through 2.3.28.1 mishandles token validation, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2171 | 1 Apache | 1 Jetspeed | 2023-12-10 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The User Manager service in Apache Jetspeed before 2.3.1 does not properly restrict access using Jetspeed Security, which allows remote attackers to (1) add, (2) edit, or (3) delete users via the REST API. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4463 | 2 Apache, Debian | 2 Xerces-c\+\+, Debian Linux | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Apache Xerces-C++ before 3.1.4 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service via a deeply nested DTD. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3576 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 3 Activemq, Business Intelligence Publisher, Fusion Middleware | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The processControlCommand function in broker/TransportConnection.java in Apache ActiveMQ before 5.11.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (shutdown) via a shutdown command. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5388 | 4 Apache, Hp, Oracle and 1 more | 11 Tomcat, System Management Homepage, Linux and 8 more | 2023-12-10 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Apache Tomcat 7.x through 7.0.70 and 8.x through 8.5.4, when the CGI Servlet is enabled, follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. NOTE: the vendor states "A mitigation is planned for future releases of Tomcat, tracked as CVE-2016-5388"; in other words, this is not a CVE ID for a vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4974 | 1 Apache | 2 Amqp 0-x Jms Client, Jms Client Amqp | 2023-12-10 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Apache Qpid AMQP 0-x JMS client before 6.0.4 and JMS (AMQP 1.0) before 0.10.0 does not restrict the use of classes available on the classpath, which might allow remote authenticated users with permission to send messages to deserialize arbitrary objects and execute arbitrary code by leveraging a crafted serialized object in a JMS ObjectMessage that is handled by the getObject function. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4431 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Apache Struts 2 2.3.20 through 2.3.28.1 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and conduct redirection attacks by leveraging a default method. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0735 | 1 Apache | 1 Ranger | 2023-12-10 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Apache Ranger 0.5.x before 0.5.2 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended parent resource-level access restrictions by leveraging mishandling of a resource-level exclude policy. | |||||