Total
669 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-22138 | 2024-03-28 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Accelerator.This issue affects Seraphinite Accelerator: from n/a through 2.20.47. | |||||
| CVE-2024-25923 | 2024-03-28 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in PeepSo Community by PeepSo.This issue affects Community by PeepSo: from n/a through 6.2.7.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-44989 | 2024-03-27 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in GSheetConnector CF7 Google Sheets Connector.This issue affects CF7 Google Sheets Connector: from n/a through 5.0.5. | |||||
| CVE-2024-25957 | 2024-03-26 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM | ||
| Dell Grab for Windows, versions 5.0.4 and below, contains a cleartext storage of sensitive information vulnerability in its appsync module. An authenticated local attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure that could be used to access the appsync application with elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36407 | 2024-03-25 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500, 5100H, 5500H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600, 5200H, 5600H, Hitachi Unified Storage VM, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H allows local users to gain sensitive information.This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500,5100H, 5500H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600,5200H, 5600H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Unified Storage VM: before DKCMAIN Ver. 73-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73-03-74/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 73(75)-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73(75)-03-74/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00. | |||||
| CVE-2023-46672 | 1 Elastic | 1 Logstash | 2024-03-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was identified by Elastic whereby sensitive information is recorded in Logstash logs under specific circumstances. The prerequisites for the manifestation of this issue are: * Logstash is configured to log in JSON format https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/logstash/current/running-logstash-command-line.html , which is not the default logging format. * Sensitive data is stored in the Logstash keystore and referenced as a variable in Logstash configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27502 | 2024-03-14 | N/A | 3.3 LOW | ||
| Insertion of sensitive information into log file for some Intel(R) Local Manageability Service software before version 2316.5.1.2 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2024-27097 | 2024-03-14 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A user endpoint didn't perform filtering on an incoming parameter, which was added directly to the application log. This could lead to an attacker injecting false log entries or corrupt the log file format. This has been fixed in the CKAN versions 2.9.11 and 2.10.4. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should override the `/user/reset` endpoint to filter the `id` parameter in order to exclude newlines. | |||||
| CVE-2024-28186 | 2024-03-13 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH | ||
| FreeScout is an open source help desk and shared inbox built with PHP. A vulnerability has been identified in the Free Scout Application, which exposes SMTP server credentials used by an organization in the application to users of the application. This issue arises from the application storing complete stack traces of exceptions in its database. The sensitive information is then inadvertently disclosed to users via the `/conversation/ajax-html/send_log?folder_id=&thread_id={id}` endpoint. The stack trace reveals value of parameters, including the username and password, passed to the `Swift_Transport_Esmtp_Auth_LoginAuthenticator->authenticate()` function. Exploiting this vulnerability allows an attacker to gain unauthorized access to SMTP server credentials. With this sensitive information in hand, the attacker can potentially send unauthorized emails from the compromised SMTP server, posing a severe threat to the confidentiality and integrity of email communications. This could lead to targeted attacks on both the application users and the organization itself, compromising the security of email exchange servers. This issue has been addressed in version 1.8.124. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should adopt the following measures: 1. Avoid Storing Complete Stack Traces, 2. Implement redaction mechanisms to filter and exclude sensitive information, and 3. Review and enhance the application's logging practices. | |||||
| CVE-2023-43043 | 2024-03-13 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM | ||
| IBM Maximo Application Suite - Maximo Mobile for EAM 8.10 and 8.11 could disclose sensitive information to a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 266875. | |||||
| CVE-2024-28236 | 2024-03-13 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH | ||
| Vela is a Pipeline Automation (CI/CD) framework built on Linux container technology written in Golang. Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. **To exploit this** the pipeline author must be supplying the secrets to a plugin that is designed in such a way that will print those parameters in logs. Plugin parameters are not designed for sensitive values and are often intentionally printed throughout execution for informational/debugging purposes. Parameters should therefore be treated as insensitive. While Vela provides secrets masking, secrets exposure is not entirely solved by the masking process. A docker image (plugin) can easily expose secrets if they are not handled properly, or altered in some way. There is a responsibility on the end-user to understand how values injected into a plugin are used. This is a risk that exists for many CICD systems (like GitHub Actions) that handle sensitive runtime variables. Rather, the greater risk is that users who restrict a secret to the "no commands" option and use image restriction can still have their secret value exposed via substitution tinkering, which turns the image and command restrictions into a false sense of security. This issue has been addressed in version 0.23.2. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should not provide sensitive values to plugins that can potentially expose them, especially in `parameters` that are not intended to be used for sensitive values, ensure plugins (especially those that utilize shared secrets) follow best practices to avoid logging parameters that are expected to be sensitive, minimize secrets with `pull_request` events enabled, as this allows users to change pipeline configurations and pull in secrets to steps not typically part of the CI process, make use of the build approval setting, restricting builds from untrusted users, and limit use of shared secrets, as they are less restrictive to access by nature. | |||||
| CVE-2023-46171 | 2024-03-08 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| IBM DS8900F HMC 89.21.19.0, 89.21.31.0, 89.30.68.0, 89.32.40.0, and 89.33.48.0 could allow an authenticated user to view sensitive log information after enumerating filenames. IBM X-Force ID: 269408. | |||||
| CVE-2023-3335 | 2 Hitachi, Linux | 2 Ops Center Administrator, Linux Kernel | 2024-03-07 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Hitachi Ops Center Administrator on Linux allows local users to gain sensitive information.This issue affects Hitachi Ops Center Administrator: before 10.9.3-00. | |||||
| CVE-2023-50740 | 2024-03-06 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In Apache Linkis <=1.4.0, The password is printed to the log when using the Oracle data source of the Linkis data source module. We recommend users upgrade the version of Linkis to version 1.5.0 | |||||
| CVE-2023-45241 | 4 Acronis, Apple, Linux and 1 more | 4 Agent, Macos, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Sensitive information leak through log files. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 35739, Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 37391. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0831 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Vault | 2024-02-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Vault and Vault Enterprise (“Vault”) may expose sensitive information when enabling an audit device which specifies the `log_raw` option, which may log sensitive information to other audit devices, regardless of whether they are configured to use `log_raw`. | |||||
| CVE-2024-22336 | 2024-02-20 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM | ||
| IBM QRadar Suite 1.10.12.0 through 1.10.17.0 and IBM Cloud Pak for Security 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.11.0 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 279976. | |||||
| CVE-2024-22335 | 2024-02-20 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM | ||
| IBM QRadar Suite 1.10.12.0 through 1.10.17.0 and IBM Cloud Pak for Security 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.11.0 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 279975. | |||||
| CVE-2023-50951 | 2024-02-20 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM | ||
| IBM QRadar Suite 1.10.12.0 through 1.10.17.0 and IBM Cloud Pak for Security 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.11.0 in some circumstances will log some sensitive information about invalid authorization attempts. IBM X-Force ID: 275747. | |||||
| CVE-2024-22337 | 2024-02-20 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM | ||
| IBM QRadar Suite 1.10.12.0 through 1.10.17.0 and IBM Cloud Pak for Security 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.11.0 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 279977. | |||||