Filtered by vendor Ibm
Subscribe
Total
6987 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2003-0123 | 1 Ibm | 2 Lotus Domino, Lotus Notes Client | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Buffer overflow in Web Retriever client for Lotus Notes/Domino R4.5 through R6 allows remote malicious web servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long HTTP status line. | |||||
CVE-2003-1361 | 2 Ibm, Veritas | 2 Tivoli Storage Manager, Bare Metal Restore | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
Unknown vulnerability in VERITAS Bare Metal Restore (BMR) of Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) 3.1.0 through 3.2.1 allows remote attackers to gain root privileges on the BMR Main Server. | |||||
CVE-1999-1531 | 1 Ibm | 1 Homepageprint | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Buffer overflow in IBM HomePagePrint 1.0.7 for Windows98J allows a malicious Web site to execute arbitrary code on a viewer's system via a long IMG_SRC HTML tag. | |||||
CVE-2001-1310 | 1 Ibm | 1 Secureway Directory | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
IBM SecureWay 3.2.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, via invalid encodings for the L field of a BER encoding, as demonstrated by the PROTOS LDAPv3 test suite. | |||||
CVE-2001-0797 | 5 Hp, Ibm, Sco and 2 more | 6 Hp-ux, Aix, Openserver and 3 more | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
Buffer overflow in login in various System V based operating systems allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a large number of arguments through services such as telnet and rlogin. | |||||
CVE-2002-1822 | 1 Ibm | 1 Http Server | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
IBM HTTP Server 1.0 on AS/400 allows remote attackers to obtain the path to the web root directory and other sensitive information, which is leaked in an error mesage when a request is made for a non-existent Java Server Page (JSP). | |||||
CVE-1999-0042 | 5 Bsdi, Caldera, Ibm and 2 more | 6 Bsd Os, Openlinux, Aix and 3 more | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
Buffer overflow in University of Washington's implementation of IMAP and POP servers. |