Filtered by vendor Octopus
Subscribe
Total
83 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-1881 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability exists where it is possible for a user to download Project Exports from a Project they do not have permissions to access. This vulnerability only impacts projects within the same Space. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2778 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to bypass rate limiting on login using null bytes. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2508 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to reveal the existence of resources in a space that the user does not have access to due to verbose error messaging. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2049 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service via the package upload function. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2075 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service targeting the build information request validation. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30532 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy, there is no logging of changes to artifacts within Octopus Deploy. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1901 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to unmask sensitive variables by using variable preview. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2572 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server where access is managed by an external authentication provider, it was possible that the API key/keys of a disabled/deleted user were still valid after the access was revoked. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2720 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that when a sensitive value is a substring of another value, sensitive value masking will only partially work. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29890 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server the help sidebar can be customized to include a Cross-Site Scripting payload in the support link. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2760 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to reveal the Space ID of spaces that the user does not have access to view in an error message when a resource is part of another Space. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2783 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that a session cookie could be used as the CSRF token | |||||
| CVE-2022-2828 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to reveal information about teams via the API due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2022-1502 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2023-12-10 | 3.5 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Permissions were not properly verified in the API on projects using version control in Git. This allowed projects to be modified by users with only ProjectView permissions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2013 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Deploy | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Octopus Server after version 2022.1.1495 and before 2022.1.2647 if private spaces were enabled via the experimental feature flag all new users would have access to the Script Console within their private space. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1670 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| When generating a user invitation code in Octopus Server, the validity of this code can be set for a specific number of users. It was possible to bypass this restriction of validity to create extra user accounts above the initial number of invited users. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26556 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| When Octopus Server is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26557 | 1 Octopus | 1 Tentacle | 2023-12-10 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| When Octopus Tentacle is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31822 | 2 Linux, Octopus | 2 Linux Kernel, Tentacle | 2023-12-10 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| When Octopus Tentacle is installed on a Linux operating system, the systemd service file permissions are misconfigured. This could lead to a local unprivileged user modifying the contents of the systemd service file to gain privileged access. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23184 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2023-12-10 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In affected Octopus Server versions when the server HTTP and HTTPS bindings are configured to localhost, Octopus Server will allow open redirects. | |||||