Total
5 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-15114 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 2 Fedora, Etcd | 2023-12-10 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.7 HIGH |
| In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, the etcd gateway is a simple TCP proxy to allow for basic service discovery and access. However, it is possible to include the gateway address as an endpoint. This results in a denial of service, since the endpoint can become stuck in a loop of requesting itself until there are no more available file descriptors to accept connections on the gateway. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15136 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 2 Fedora, Etcd | 2023-12-10 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In ectd before versions 3.4.10 and 3.3.23, gateway TLS authentication is only applied to endpoints detected in DNS SRV records. When starting a gateway, TLS authentication will only be attempted on endpoints identified in DNS SRV records for a given domain, which occurs in the discoverEndpoints function. No authentication is performed against endpoints provided in the --endpoints flag. This has been fixed in versions 3.4.10 and 3.3.23 with improved documentation and deprecation of the functionality. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15115 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 2 Fedora, Etcd | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10 does not perform any password length validation, which allows for very short passwords, such as those with a length of one. This may allow an attacker to guess or brute-force users' passwords with little computational effort. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1099 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 2 Fedora, Etcd | 2023-12-10 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| DNS rebinding vulnerability found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can control his DNS records to direct to localhost, and trick the browser into sending requests to localhost (or any other address). | |||||
| CVE-2018-1098 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 2 Fedora, Etcd | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A cross-site request forgery flaw was found in etcd 3.3.1 and earlier. An attacker can set up a website that tries to send a POST request to the etcd server and modify a key. Adding a key is done with PUT so it is theoretically safe (can't PUT from an HTML form or such) but POST allows creating in-order keys that an attacker can send. | |||||