Total
959 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-29504 | 1 Dell | 2 Bsafe Crypto-c-micro-edition, Bsafe Micro-edition-suite | 2024-02-08 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.5.2, contain a Missing Required Cryptographic Step Vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-51837 | 1 Meshcentral | 1 Meshcentral | 2024-02-05 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Ylianst MeshCentral 1.1.16 is vulnerable to Missing SSL Certificate Validation. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0466 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to implicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate verification. However the implementation of the function does not enable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to pass the certificate verification. As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was decided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function. Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate policy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly enable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument. Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not commonly used by applications. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0465 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0464 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2024-02-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17215 | 1 Postman | 1 Postman | 2024-02-01 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An information-disclosure issue was discovered in Postman through 6.3.0. It validates a server's X.509 certificate and presents an error if the certificate is not valid. Unfortunately, the associated HTTPS request data is sent anyway. Only the response is not displayed. Thus, all contained information of the HTTPS request is disclosed to a man-in-the-middle attacker (for example, user credentials). | |||||
| CVE-2023-33760 | 1 Splicecom | 1 Maximiser Soft Pbx | 2024-01-31 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| SpliceCom Maximiser Soft PBX v1.5 and before was discovered to utilize a default SSL certificate. This issue can allow attackers to eavesdrop on communications via a man-in-the-middle attack. | |||||
| CVE-2023-33757 | 1 Splicecom | 2 Ipcs, Ipcs2 | 2024-01-31 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A lack of SSL certificate validation in Splicecom iPCS (iOS App) v1.3.4, iPCS2 (iOS App) v2.8 and before, and iPCS (Android App) v1.8.5 and before allows attackers to eavesdrop on communications via a man-in-the-middle attack. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6043 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Vantage | 2024-01-26 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Vantage that could allow a local attacker to bypass integrity checks and execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20960 | 1 Cisco | 1 Email Security Appliance | 2024-01-25 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of certain TLS connections that are processed by an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing a large number of concurrent TLS connections to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to drop new TLS email messages that come from the associated email servers. Exploitation of this vulnerability does not cause the affected device to unexpectedly reload. The device will recover autonomously within a few hours of when the attack is halted or mitigated. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7922 | 1 Mongodb | 1 Mongodb Enterprise Kubernetes Operator | 2024-01-23 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| X.509 certificates generated by the MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator may allow an attacker with access to the Kubernetes cluster improper access to MongoDB instances. Customers who do not use X.509 authentication, and those who do not use the Operator to generate their X.509 certificates are unaffected. This issue affects MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator version 1.0, MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator version 1.1, MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator version 1.2 versions prior to 1.2.4, MongoDB Enterprise Kubernetes Operator version 1.3 versions prior to 1.3.1, 1.2, 1.4 versions prior to 1.4.4. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23588 | 2 Microchip, Siemens | 10 Maxview Storage Manager, Simatic Ipc1047, Simatic Ipc1047 Firmware and 7 more | 2024-01-11 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC IPC1047 (All versions), SIMATIC IPC1047E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < 4.09.00.25611 on Windows), SIMATIC IPC647D (All versions), SIMATIC IPC647E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < 4.09.00.25611 on Windows), SIMATIC IPC847D (All versions), SIMATIC IPC847E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < 4.09.00.25611 on Windows). The Adaptec Maxview application on affected devices is using a non-unique TLS certificate across installations to protect the communication from the local browser to the local application. A local attacker may use this key to decrypt intercepted local traffic between the browser and the application and could perform a man-in-the-middle attack in order to modify data in transit. | |||||
| CVE-2023-41991 | 1 Apple | 3 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos | 2024-01-10 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A certificate validation issue was addressed. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.6, iOS 16.7 and iPadOS 16.7. A malicious app may be able to bypass signature validation. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited against versions of iOS before iOS 16.7. | |||||
| CVE-2023-34414 | 1 Mozilla | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird | 2024-01-07 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| The error page for sites with invalid TLS certificates was missing the activation-delay Firefox uses to protect prompts and permission dialogs from attacks that exploit human response time delays. If a malicious page elicited user clicks in precise locations immediately before navigating to a site with a certificate error and made the renderer extremely busy at the same time, it could create a gap between when the error page was loaded and when the display actually refreshed. With the right timing the elicited clicks could land in that gap and activate the button that overrides the certificate error for that site. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.12, Firefox < 114, and Thunderbird < 102.12. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22939 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 8 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 5 more | 2024-01-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| If the Node.js https API was used incorrectly and "undefined" was in passed for the "rejectUnauthorized" parameter, no error was returned and connections to servers with an expired certificate would have been accepted. | |||||
| CVE-2023-5594 | 1 Eset | 9 Endpoint Antivirus, Endpoint Security, File Security and 6 more | 2024-01-04 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH |
| Improper validation of the server’s certificate chain in secure traffic scanning feature considered intermediate certificate signed using the MD5 or SHA1 algorithm as trusted. | |||||
| CVE-2023-51662 | 1 Snowflake | 1 Snowflake Connector | 2024-01-03 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Snowflake .NET driver provides an interface to the Microsoft .NET open source software framework for developing applications. Snowflake recently received a report about a vulnerability in the Snowflake Connector .NET where the checks against the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) were not performed where the insecureMode flag was set to false, which is the default setting. The vulnerability affects versions between 2.0.25 and 2.1.4 (inclusive). Snowflake fixed the issue in version 2.1.5. | |||||
| CVE-2023-46724 | 1 Squid-cache | 1 Squid | 2023-12-29 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Squid is a caching proxy for the Web. Due to an Improper Validation of Specified Index bug, Squid versions 3.3.0.1 through 5.9 and 6.0 prior to 6.4 compiled using `--with-openssl` are vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack against SSL Certificate validation. This problem allows a remote server to perform Denial of Service against Squid Proxy by initiating a TLS Handshake with a specially crafted SSL Certificate in a server certificate chain. This attack is limited to HTTPS and SSL-Bump. This bug is fixed in Squid version 6.4. In addition, patches addressing this problem for the stable releases can be found in Squid's patch archives. Those who you use a prepackaged version of Squid should refer to the package vendor for availability information on updated packages. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1514 | 1 Hitachienergy | 1 Rtu500 Scripting Interface | 2023-12-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43882 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Defender For Iot | 2023-12-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||