Total
549 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-31449 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing further free operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13280. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31456 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13102. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27271 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in an out-of-bounds read condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12438. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27263 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12290. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38573 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1.4. It allows writing to arbitrary files because a CombineFiles pathname is not validated. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26534 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. There is an Opt object use-after-free related to Field::ClearItems and Field::DeleteOptions, during AcroForm JavaScript execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27860 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.1.35811. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11727. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20312 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read, a different issue than CVE-2018-20310 because of a different opcode. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26539 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. When there is a multiple interpretation error for /V (in the Additional Action and Field dictionaries), a use-after-free can occur with resultant remote code execution (or an information leak). | |||||
| CVE-2018-20316 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read, a different issue than CVE-2018-20310 because of a different opcode. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26535 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. If TslAlloc attempts to allocate thread local storage but obtains an unacceptable index value, V8 throws an exception that leads to a write access violation (and read access violation). | |||||
| CVE-2018-20313 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyPreviewAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17410 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of GIF files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11135. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17414 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2023-12-10 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.0.35798. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the configuration files used by the Foxit Reader Update Service. The issue results from incorrect permissions set on a resource used by the service. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-11229. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26538 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2023-12-10 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. It allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse taskkill.exe in the current working directory. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26537 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 10.1. In a certain Shading calculation, the number of outputs is unequal to the number of color components in a color space. This causes an out-of-bounds write. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28203 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527 and earlier. There is a null pointer access/dereference while opening a crafted PDF file, leading the application to crash (denial of service). | |||||
| CVE-2020-17416 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JPEG2000 images. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11497. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20309 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyGetAppEdition race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26540 | 2 Apple, Foxitsoftware | 3 Macos, Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 4.1 on macOS. Because the Hardened Runtime protection mechanism is not applied to code signing, code injection (or an information leak) can occur. | |||||