Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscribe
Total
486 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-10744 | 5 F5, Lodash, Netapp and 2 more | 21 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 18 more | 2024-01-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20314 | 3 Fedoraproject, Libspf2, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Libspf2, Enterprise Linux | 2024-01-15 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Stack buffer overflow in libspf2 versions below 1.2.11 when processing certain SPF macros can lead to Denial of service and potentially code execution via malicious crafted SPF explanation messages. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8103 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-01-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The Jenkins CLI subsystem in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object, related to a problematic webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/lib/commons-collections-*.jar file and the "Groovy variant in 'ysoserial'". | |||||
| CVE-2023-3961 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Samba | 5 Fedora, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 2 more | 2024-01-02 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A path traversal vulnerability was identified in Samba when processing client pipe names connecting to Unix domain sockets within a private directory. Samba typically uses this mechanism to connect SMB clients to remote procedure call (RPC) services like SAMR LSA or SPOOLSS, which Samba initiates on demand. However, due to inadequate sanitization of incoming client pipe names, allowing a client to send a pipe name containing Unix directory traversal characters (../). This could result in SMB clients connecting as root to Unix domain sockets outside the private directory. If an attacker or client managed to send a pipe name resolving to an external service using an existing Unix domain socket, it could potentially lead to unauthorized access to the service and consequential adverse events, including compromise or service crashes. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10158 | 2 Infinispan, Redhat | 2 Infinispan, Jboss Data Grid | 2023-12-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A flaw was found in Infinispan through version 9.4.14.Final. An improper implementation of the session fixation protection in the Spring Session integration can result in incorrect session handling. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8088 | 3 Oracle, Qos, Redhat | 14 Goldengate Application Adapters, Goldengate Stream Analytics, Utilities Framework and 11 more | 2023-12-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| org.slf4j.ext.EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J before 1.8.0-beta2 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted data. EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J, has been fixed in SLF4J versions 1.7.26 later and in the 2.0.x series. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6394 | 2 Quarkus, Redhat | 2 Quarkus, Build Of Quarkus | 2023-12-20 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A flaw was found in Quarkus. This issue occurs when receiving a request over websocket with no role-based permission specified on the GraphQL operation, Quarkus processes the request without authentication despite the endpoint being secured. This can allow an attacker to access information and functionality outside of normal granted API permissions. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8668 | 3 Libtiff, Oracle, Redhat | 6 Libtiff, Linux, Vm Server and 3 more | 2023-12-20 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the PackBitsPreEncode function in tif_packbits.c in bmp2tiff in libtiff 4.0.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a large width field in a BMP image. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0118 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 3 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Foreman | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An arbitrary code execution flaw was found in Foreman. This flaw allows an admin user to bypass safe mode in templates and execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3874 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 2 Satellite, Foreman | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A command injection flaw was found in foreman. This flaw allows an authenticated user with admin privileges on the foreman instance to transpile commands through CoreOS and Fedora CoreOS configurations in templates, possibly resulting in arbitrary command execution on the underlying operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0923 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift Data Science | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A flaw was found in the Kubernetes service for notebooks in RHODS, where it does not prevent pods from other namespaces and applications from making requests to the Jupyter API. This flaw can lead to file content exposure and other issues. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38734 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Robotic Process Automation, Windows, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.1 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.1 is vulnerable to incorrect privilege assignment when importing users from an LDAP directory. IBM X-Force ID: 262481. | |||||
| CVE-2023-43058 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 23.0.9 is vulnerable to privilege escalation that affects ownership of projects. IBM X-Force ID: 247527. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0462 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 2 Satellite, Foreman | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An arbitrary code execution flaw was found in Foreman. This issue may allow an admin user to execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system by setting global parameters with a YAML payload. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4039 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Openshift Container Platform, Openshift Container Platform For Ibm Z and 3 more | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Single Sign-On for OpenShift container images, which are configured with an unsecured management interface enabled. This flaw allows an attacker to use this interface to deploy malicious code and access and modify potentially sensitive information in the app server configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2319 | 2 Clusterlabs, Redhat | 3 Pcs, Enterprise Linux High Availability, Enterprise Linux High Availability Eus | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| It was discovered that an update for PCS package in RHBA-2023:2151 erratum released as part of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 failed to include the fix for the Webpack issue CVE-2023-28154 (for PCS package), which was previously addressed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.1 via erratum RHSA-2023:1591. The CVE-2023-2319 was assigned to that Red Hat specific security regression in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2. | |||||
| CVE-2023-34152 | 3 Fedoraproject, Imagemagick, Redhat | 4 Extra Packages For Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Imagemagick and 1 more | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability was found in ImageMagick. This security flaw cause a remote code execution vulnerability in OpenBlob with --enable-pipes configured. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4116 | 2 Quarkus, Redhat | 2 Quarkus, Build Of Quarkus | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability was found in quarkus. This security flaw happens in Dev UI Config Editor which is vulnerable to drive-by localhost attacks leading to remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2022-41731 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Watson Knowledge Catalog On Cloud Pak For Data, Openshift | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog on Cloud Pak for Data 4.5.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 237402. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3782 | 1 Redhat | 1 Keycloak | 2023-12-10 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| keycloak: path traversal via double URL encoding. A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. An attacker can use this flaw to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and potentially sensitive information within the domain or possibly conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field. | |||||