Total
29 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-42013 | 4 Apache, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 1 more | 6 Http Server, Fedora, Cloud Backup and 3 more | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| It was found that the fix for CVE-2021-41773 in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.50 was insufficient. An attacker could use a path traversal attack to map URLs to files outside the directories configured by Alias-like directives. If files outside of these directories are not protected by the usual default configuration "require all denied", these requests can succeed. If CGI scripts are also enabled for these aliased pathes, this could allow for remote code execution. This issue only affects Apache 2.4.49 and Apache 2.4.50 and not earlier versions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26691 | 5 Apache, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 8 Http Server, Debian Linux, Fedora and 5 more | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 to 2.4.46 a specially crafted SessionHeader sent by an origin server could cause a heap overflow | |||||
| CVE-2021-33193 | 4 Apache, Fedoraproject, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Http Server, Fedora, Secure Backup and 2 more | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A crafted method sent through HTTP/2 will bypass validation and be forwarded by mod_proxy, which can lead to request splitting or cache poisoning. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 to 2.4.48. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3712 | 7 Debian, Mcafee, Netapp and 4 more | 32 Debian Linux, Epolicy Orchestrator, Clustered Data Ontap and 29 more | 2023-12-10 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3450 | 10 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Mcafee and 7 more | 35 Fedora, Freebsd, Web Gateway and 32 more | 2023-12-10 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3449 | 12 Checkpoint, Debian, Fedoraproject and 9 more | 167 Multi-domain Management, Multi-domain Management Firmware, Quantum Security Gateway and 164 more | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2019-10219 | 3 Netapp, Oracle, Redhat | 195 Active Iq Unified Manager, Element, Management Services For Element Software And Netapp Hci and 192 more | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1351 | 3 Apple, Oracle, Php | 5 Mac Os X, Linux, Secure Backup and 2 more | 2023-12-10 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Use-after-free vulnerability in the _zend_shared_memdup function in zend_shared_alloc.c in the OPcache extension in PHP through 5.6.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2010-0072 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Backup component in Oracle Secure Backup 10.2.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a buffer overflow in observiced.exe that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to a "reverse lookup of connections" to TCP port 10000. | |||||
| CVE-2010-0899 | 2 Microsoft, Oracle | 2 Windows, Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 9.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0898, CVE-2010-0907, and CVE-2010-0906. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2251 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Backup component in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2010-3596 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the mod_ssl component in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity and availability via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2010-0906 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 9.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2010-0907 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0898, CVE-2010-0899, CVE-2010-0904, and CVE-2010-0906. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2261 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Backup component in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-2252. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2252 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Backup component in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-2261. | |||||
| CVE-2010-0904 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2010-0898 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1978 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 9.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Backup component in Oracle Secure Backup 10.2.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the July 2009 Oracle CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from an independent researcher that this vulnerability allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges via vectors involving property_box.php. | |||||
| CVE-2008-5443 | 1 Oracle | 1 Secure Backup | 2023-12-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Backup component in Oracle Secure Backup 10.2.0.2 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-5441 and CVE-2008-5442. | |||||